Sender Information: System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment+HostingManager/6044116 Exception: System.ServiceModel.ServiceActivationException: The service ‘/ClientWebService/Client.asmx' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation We are using SSL for WSUS, let me know if you want the complete After you browse to the location of the WSUSutil.exe tool you must execute the following command: WSUSutil.exe reset Reset: You use this command if you store updates locally on your WSUS WSUS servicing can and should be simpler than that. After I uninstalled KB3159706 and restarted the server it works again. Check This Out
Get our InfoWorld Daily Newsletter: Go Microsoft releases KB 3161647, KB 3161608 to fix slow Windows 7 update scans Early results look promising: the many-hours-long Win7 waits may be behind us We too are running on 2012 R2 and have migrated off of WID and to a remote SQL server. I un-installed KB3159706. Post-configuration seemed to be required for that, which didn't seem to work.
WSUS 3.0 SP2 will never be able to deploy the Upgrades classification (what we're calling feature updates going forward), but any clients directly connected to your [patched] Windows Server 2012 or After that, the site worked fine. The wsus service has started automatically --- (HTTP Activation and changing Web.config I already had done last time) Hope it will work now. Reply Hilo10-22-14 Thank you very much! 🙂 It helped me alot Reply roberu09-16-14 WONDERFUL it's solve my probleme.
Kirk says: May 10, 2016 at 8:27 AM That worked a lot better than KB3148812, so thanks for that. For now have hidden the update KB3159706, until some resolution is found. Can you ask it with more detail? 800b0001 Wsus Updates had to be run by checking updates online.
The latter offers an opportunity to directly download the update, and then move it to your WSUS server via trusted file shares after performing the appropriate virus scans and such. I fought for days with it, installing various patches for WSUS itself, trying to reconfigure IIS, and pouring over log after log. I disabled this and now my clients are able to update. Reply Steve Henry [MSFT] says: August 3, 2016 at 2:38 PM I didn't see anywhere that you executed the manual steps required to make KB3159706 work.
Reply Matthew Davison says: May 12, 2016 at 2:28 AM Hi Steve, The issue here isn't the need to take ownership. Windows Update Error 80072ee2 Server 2008 I can connect to the console after installing the KB3159706 and performing the manual post-install steps on 2012 R1 WSUS, but clients are unable to connect to the WSUS server with You can use this script for automating a few steps. Reply Chris06-27-13 Perfect!
Steve Henry [MSFT] says: August 3, 2016 at 2:19 PM There's a little more to it than that. Privacy statement © 2016 Microsoft. Wsus Error Code 80072ee2 Your post has really helped me pull my head out of … Reply Hubert Trzewik09-19-13 Worked for me. 80072ee2 Wsus Windows 7 Can you double-check the edits that you made to it?
Links I found this solution in a PDF posted by Solar Winds, the below is a link to the PDF which has some good WSUS info the PDF is also attached. his comment is here Dolgopolov says: May 6, 2016 at 5:57 AM I didn't install KB3148812, but after KB3159706 installation my WSUS was broken and uninstall of this update fix the server. If you've got an environment that we can debug live, then I can set up a quick meeting; short of that, we'll keep trying. Resolution Locally on the WSUS server open a command prompt Navigate to where WSUS is installed on a 32-bit server this is generally under C:\Program Files\Update Services\Tools Run wsusutil reset The WSUS Kb3159706
At least that's how it was reported in the Microsoft Services Status Dashboard. Had you already run the manual steps after installing KB3159706? Cause A couple of weeks ago a technician had declined a large amount of active needed updates and run the server cleanup tool, when this was discovered the WSUS SQL Database this contact form If so, then please post your issue in the WSUS forum, so that we can properly troubleshoot.
Why didn’t Japan attack the West Coast of the United States during World War II? Windows Update Error 80072ee2 Server 2012 Reply Steve Henry [MSFT] says: June 9, 2016 at 6:10 PM This is not feasible long term. Some of the clients seem to have no problem, while others keep returning the error "80072EE2" when attempting to manually check for updates using Windows Update.
On Friday morning Microsoft pulled the WSUS Product Team blog post. In the problem clients' WindowsUpdate.log, we see: 2015-12-04 11:12:33:847 968 12ac PT Server URL = http://server.domain.com/SimpleAuthWebService/SimpleAuth.asmx 2015-12-04 11:13:37:937 968 12ac Misc WARNING: Send failed with hr = 80072ee2. 2015-12-04 11:13:37:937 968 Rebooted, reapplied the update and followed the manual steps, first without and then with the SSL options in web.config (we don't use SSL internally). Wsus Error 80072efd If not, then I might be able to get someone to try this out.
Microsoft needs to add some sort of notification about the manual steps, or better yet, do them programmatically. Reply Malcolmo says: May 12, 2016 at 3:29 AM After installing KB3159706 and going through the manual changes afterwards WSUS runs OK and Syncs to my upstream server. This product ends its life cycle in July 2017, and we've got more changes planned to help support Windows as a service, so it doesn't make sense to pull this product navigate here The Expanding IT Attack Surface Geek to Geek – Privileged Account Security from a Unix Perspective – Part 2 More Webcasts Sponsored Links: Contact UsAdvertisePrint Issues OnlineEventsFree NewslettersReprintsSubscribe/RenewList Rental ApplicationDevelopmentTrendsAWSInsider.netEnterpriseSystemsMCPmag.comRedmondChannelPartnerVirtualizationReviewVisualStudioMagazine ©
Reply Michael S says: May 26, 2016 at 9:34 AM I'm still having issues after installing KB3159706, performed restart, ran postinstall, and add new Features for HTTP Activation. Now when I run the postinstall /servicing bit, it seems to detect that the system had the WID role and tries to mess w/ that DB, which isn't present/used: 2016-05-15 18:58:07 Reply Jim Sutton says: May 12, 2016 at 5:16 AM This update caused same issue as KB3148812. However I now have the following error reported in the Application Event Log:- Source System.ServiceModel 18.104.22.168 Event ID 3 Task Category WebHost WebHost failed to process a request.
This update has manual steps that I will have to remember. Michael says: May 16, 2016 at 11:31 PM Is there any change to be made on the LTSB of Windows 10? Due to this lack of responses to affected people, we are forced to rebuild our entire WSUS structure from scratch. However, the next time I go to open the console (a day or two later) I get the same message Error: Connection Error Reset Server Node.
They pop up when approving in WSUS, and this might have alerted many admins to either defer the update or at least be aware that this update is unusual, special, different, On the 12th May I approved and installed all available updates including KB3159706, KB3148812 is not in my list of installed updates nor is available for install. What is the total sum of the cardinalities of all subsets of a set? Reply Steve Henry [MSFT] says: June 9, 2016 at 6:07 PM Sounds like you haven't run the manual steps (specifically postinstall /servicing) described at https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/kb/3159706.
WSUS admins on April 19 received patch KB 3148812, described in the KB article as "an update to a feature that enables Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) to natively decrypt Electronic Reply Scott says: May 6, 2016 at 9:55 AM Installing this update broke the WSUS console and created an error on connected devices. Now I am getting error 8024400E on clients when I attempt to update. Uninstalled it.
Reply Tom says: May 12, 2016 at 7:28 AM After the update is installed there should be some kind of notification for admins that further steps are needed or update the It doesn't affect any actual operations, does it? We're looking at not requiring manual steps to finalize future updates, since this caused an unnecessary amount of confusion. Is there a particular column in the DB we should look for to indicate everything is fine?
I am sure your team has just wasted over a hundred thousand hours of admins in this country alone scrambling trying to figure out why their patching has broken.